Gravity, Gravitational Strain & The Ever-Changing Geo-Magneto-Electric Field
A theoretical framework, designed to extend Michael Faraday’s vision of an empirical approach to identify & investigate correlated gravitational and electromagnetic fields
Exploring the Frequency behavior of the Geomagnetic Field
As questions began to arise regarding the frequency behavior of the geomagnetic field, the associated research challenges appeared insurmountable. With geomagnetic field monitoring unit (Alpha Labs mr3) analog output ranging from -2.5 volts to + 2.5 volts covering the full range of the magnetometer (-250,000 nT - +250,000 nT). Using a 12-bit analog to digital (A/D) converter with 4096 digital “steps” to monitor full range would result in low resolution data. The magnetometer’s output was recalibrated to custom specifications in line with A/D converter input requirements. Magnetometer analog output recalibration provided 0 to +2.5 volt output covering a geomagnetic field from 0 to 6500 nT. This recalibration allowed precision monitoring (1.59 nT/step [nominal]) of the Y’ and Z’ (horizontal) axes. While this recalibration allowed precision monitoring of the geomagnetic field, it ushered in a whole new set of challenges. Primary among the new challenges was the need for frequent magnetic probe realignment. Out of range, missing data is a result. Because the 12-bit A/D converter used in this research (Picolog 1216) would only allow a total sampling rate of 1000 samples per second (s/s), two-channels of geomagnetic data were sampled at a rate of 500 s/s. This represents a major limitation to the long-term usefulness of this data collection configuration, but as a tool for preliminary research, it has served its purpose.
Geomagnetic Frequency Behavior
Fast Fourier transforms (FFT) were performed on geomagnetic data sampled at rate of 500 s/s. Visual analysis reveals frequency-based diurnal patterns. Beginning at noon, 1 October 2022 Figure 1 charts display hourly FFTs through Noon on 2 October 2022. Six charts display 4 hourly transforms in each chart. The general pattern is visible in Figure 1 below. Frequency Transforms show trend toward slowing beginning at noon on 1 August through 8:00 AM on 2 August 2020. At 8:00 AM the frequencies increase in speed until 12:00 Noon.
Figure 1.
24 Hours of Geomagnetic Frequency Behavior
Geomagnetic field amplitude variability (red) is reduced during polarized air gas surges.
Figure 2.
Geomagnetic Frequency Behavior - A Diurnal Pattern
Figure 2 displays 18 charts (4 hourly transforms in each chart) for time period from 8:00 AM – 12:00 Noon on many consecutive days in October 2022. Of 18 examples displayed below, all but 1 chart reveal a pattern of increasing speed between 8:00 AM and Noon. The only exception to this pattern can be seen on the 12 October 2022 display.
Magneto-Electric Correlation
Twenty-four hour correlation coefficients (Pearson’s rho) were calculated for Y’-axis geomagnetic field data and anion data. Correlations ranged from -0.268 to -0.730. In comparison, Magneto-Electric correlations during time of anion surge activity ranged from -0.896 to -0.947. Select segments had correlations up to -0.971. (See Figure 6.) Visual inspection provides a clear indication of the correlated nature of these data streams. Statistical analyses provide complementary evidence as a coherent story emerges.
Figure 3.
Magneto-Electric Correlations
Visual and Statistical evidence of correlated geomagnetic & polarized air gas processes.
Figure 4.
Magneto-Electric Correlations
Visual and Statistical evidence of correlated geomagnetic & polarized air gas processes.
Figure 5.
Magneto-Electric Correlations
Visual and Statistical evidence of correlated geomagnetic & polarized air gas processes.
Figure 6.
Magneto-Electric Correlations
Visual and Statistical evidence of correlated geomagnetic & polarized air gas processes.
Figure 7.
Magneto-Electric Correlations
Visual and Statistical evidence of correlated geomagnetic & polarized air gas processes.
Figure 8.
Magneto-Electric Correlations
Visual and Statistical evidence of correlated geomagnetic & polarized air gas processes.
Gravitational Strain
Gravitational strain is proposed as a construct to assist in understanding factors which might contribute to observed changes in geomagnetic behavior.
Gravitational Strain Calculation*
Additive gravitational strain: g-strain+ = |gSUN| | + |gMOON|
Multiplicative gravitational strain: g-strain* = |gSUN| * |gMOON| *Gravitational Acceleration (g)
*Gravitational Acceleration (g) Calculation completed using E-Tide program provided by Dr. Emile Klingelé of ETH Zurich
Figure 9.
Gravitational Strain, Geomagnetics & Polarized Air Gases
Visual and Statistical evidence of correlated geomagnetic & polarized air gas processes.
Figure 10.
Gravitational Strain, Geomagnetics & Polarized Air Gases
Cation behavior in relation to moon set, zero crossing & g-strain+ are noteworthy.
Figure 11.
Gravitational Strain, Geomagnetics & Polarized Air Gases
Anion and Cation behavior in relation to sun rise, geomagnetic field disruption, and g-strain+ is noteworthy
Low-Tech Magnetic Frequency Generator
Demonstration of Concept
It is hypothesized that magnetic frequency behavior is impacted by gravitational strain. One test of this concept is to place a horseshoe magnet under strain and observe its impact on the geomagnetic field. A question: Are magnetic frequencies impacted by traveling through water?
Figure 12.
Magnetic Frequency Generator: Exp. 1A
Figure 13.
Magnetic Frequency Generator: Exp. 1B
Figure 14.
Magnetic Frequency Generator: Exp. 1C
Conclusion & Hypothesis
The observational approach and descriptive analyses detailed above are a step in the direction of utilizing methodologically sound and conceptually robust strategies to more fully explore concepts presented by (1) Faraday, (2) Einstein, (3) Burr and Northrup in their 1935 article entitled “The Electrodynamic Theory of Life” and by (4) David Bohm in his book, Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Bohm wrote about the value of understanding how the sub-quantum world and the classical, large-scale world of physical phenomena interact. He spoke of:
"The coupling of some new kind of sub-quantum process (as yet unknown, but perhaps to be discovered later) to the observable large-scale classical phenomena. Such a process would presumably involve high frequencies and therefore high energies, but in a new way. “ (p. 136)
In line with (A) Bohm’s assessment above, and (B) observational data presented herein:
It is hypothesized that:
(1) gravitational fields result in localized deformations of the planet & variations in g, and
(2) produce measurable alterations in local geomagnetic fields, which
(3) are causally related to air gas polarization processes, and associated sub-atomic (i.e. quantum), molecular transformations.
Additional research is needed to evaluate this hypothesis. Replication is required to (1) demonstrate that two-factor and three-factor correlations are consistently and repeatedly observed and (2) refine the observational & analytic methods to better understand the interrelatedness of gravitational, magnetic and electrical fields.
Desert Winds
Desert winds such as the Santa Ana Winds of Southern California and the Sharav Winds of the Middle East have been associated with debilitating symptoms including lethargy and depression. It is suspected (but not universally accepted) that these symptoms are caused by the abrupt introduction of a high density positive ion (cation) environment.
Krueger (1976) suggested that:
“The sharav produces illness in about 30% of the exposed population” (p.1212)
Referenced Materials
Bohm D. Wholeness and the implicate order. United Kingdom: Routledge; 1980
Burr H.S., & Northrop F. (1935) The electro-dynamic theory of life. Q Rev Biol. 10(3) pp. 322-33.
Albert Paul Krueger, Eddie James Reed, Biological Impact of Small Air Ions. .Science193,1209-1213(1976).DOI:10.1126/science.959834